An independent research institute. Free, fast, fully-public peer review across complexity science, information theory, and computing — and accepted authors are gathered into Persistence, the Institute's annual print paperback and ebook.

Science has a gatekeeping problem. The apparatus that controls what gets published — institutional affiliations, article-processing charges, journal subscription fees — filters research before it evaluates it. ICSAC publishes rigorous work across scientific domains without any of that apparatus. Every submission is evaluated on the science alone: the mathematics, the methodology, the honest account of what the work demonstrates and where it fails. Not by the institution that produced it.

Research Programs

Case Study · 01

Rejected for being public — then made more public, in the same hour, by the same publisher.

On 2026-05-12, a Springer Nature journal rejected a manuscript on a similarity score that almost entirely matched the author's own openly-licensed deposits. Seventy-five minutes later, the publisher's own preprint subsidiary deposited yet another copy of the same manuscript — under a new DOI — with a congratulations email. The journal arm and the preprint arm of the same publisher triggered both ends of the contradiction in the same evening.

Read Case 01 →